Translation & Sermon by Nate Wilson for Christ the Redeemer Church of Manhattan, KS, 8 Mar. 2019
Omitting the greyed-out text should bring verbal delivery time down around 45 minutes.
The loss of World War I left Germany in shambles, but it was in this context that Adolf Hitler rose to power, offering the hope of a glorious future to his people if they would follow his Führerprinzip of unity under a single person’s leadership.
And it worked! As the cities were cleaned up and the Communists pushed out of power and the bright festivals full of healthy youth returned, loyalty was quickly forged between the German people and their new Führer.
Practically every social structure in the country – the media, the political parities, the universities, the labor unions, the Roman Catholic churches – all gladly submitted to the control of Adolf Hitler’s regime... except for the German Evangelical Church (which today we would call the Lutheran church).
In 1933, Hitler moved to bring all the Protestant churches under his authority too. He promoted Ludwig Muller as a state-puppet bishop over 27 Protestant denominations in Germany, then manipulated church elections to make it appear that the churches all agreed to it, and ordered “every church in Germany to be decorated with Nazi flags and a proclamation read from the pulpit, stating that ‘all those who are concerned … feel deeply thankful that the state should have assumed... the great load and burden of reorganizing the church.’ … They also passed a ruling that all pastors take a loyalty oath to Hitler and his government… and outlaw[ed] all Jews or persons married to Jews from church office.”1
What would you have done under those circumstances? Hitler said of the German Evangelical Church, “They will betray anything for the sake of their miserable little jobs and incomes.” But he misjudged Martin Niemoller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer. By the end of the year, Martin and Dietrich had organized a church resistance movement called the Pastor’s Emergency League with 6,000 members, committed only to the authority of “Holy Scripture and the Confessions of the Reformation.” In the following months, this Pastor’s League also passed the Barmen Declaration which stated, “We repudiate the false teaching that the state... become the single and total order of human life, and also thereby fulfill the commission of he church... The commission of the church, in which her freedom is founded, consists in this: in place of Christ and thus in the service of His own word and work, to extend, through word and sacrament, the message of free grace of God to all people.” (That last phrase “all people” was a rebuttal to the Nazi denial of Jewish conversions to Christianity.)
Hitler told his bishops, “Christianity will disappear from Germany, just as it has in Russia… the churches today cannot get rid of the indisputable facts… history will simply leave them behind.” (Have you heard that one before?)
Bonhoffer and Niemoller then organized a denomination called the Confessing Church. They risked losing their salaries, losing accreditation for their seminaries, being harassed by police, and imprisoned in concentration camps, but they were committed to the authority of Jesus Christ above all others in the church and in the world. On August 23, 1935, they sent a letter to Hitler reprimanding him for his unjust treatment of Jews and of political dissenters – and read copies aloud to their congregations. Bonhoeffer is quoted as saying, “We must not worry what people think. We must be the church and speak as Christ.”
Hitler’s Ministry of Church Affairs then “declared all organizations of the Confessing Church illegal, and … began to tighten the noose around the necks of those who would not cooperate … In the following months, the great energetic unity of Barmen began to crack into a thousand fragments.” Pastors in the Confessing Church defected in large numbers. Two years later, Martin Niemoller found himself in prison. It is reported that one day, a state-sponsored prison chaplain visited Martin’s cell, asking, “Why are you in prison?” To which Martin replied, “Why are you NOT in prison?” Some seven years later, Niemoller lived to see the end of the Nazi regime, but Bonhoeffer was put to death in a concentration camp.
Now, I may not agree with everything that the German Confessing Church said and did, but their courage in going all-out for Jesus in the face of powerful systems of blasphemy shines as a sterling example of the same kind of courage and devotion which the book of Hebrews calls Christians to – both in the first Century as well as today.
In First Century Judea, the face of this blasphemy against Christ took the form of conservative Judaism, the very conservatism of which made it all the more attractive. Most Jews reasoned that Jesus was a Johnny-come-lately, a ridiculous novelty who had been duly convicted by the highest courts of blasphemy and executed as a criminal, so it was the height of foolishness to be a Christian. “Not so!” argues back the Apostle in...
The “blood” being “brought in” refers to the instructions God gave for sin offerings in Leviticus 4 and on the Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16:27 “And, as for the young bull of the sin-offering (and the goat of the sin-offering whose blood was brought into the sanctuary to make atonement), it shall be taken outside of the camp, and they shall burn their hides – and their flesh and their dung – in the fire." (NAW)
The sin offering therefore was one of the few that was not eaten. Its blood was sprinkled inside the temple and its body was incinerated outside the settlement. The Old Testament Jews couldn’t eat that one.
John Calvin commented: "No wonder if the rites of the Law have now ceased, for this is what was typified by the sacrifice which the Levites brought without the camp to be there burnt; for as the ministers of the tabernacle did eat nothing of it, so if we serve the tabernacle, that is, retain its ceremonies, we shall not be partakers of that sacrifice which Christ once offered, nor of the expiation which he once made by his own blood; for his own blood he brought into the heavenly sanctuary that he might atone for the sin of the world."
In the Old Testament, a priest was not a priest without an altar. The altar was the only place where God and man could connect. We saw earlier in Hebrews 7:13 that Jesus was from the priesthood of Melchizedek which had never offered any sacrifices on the altar of the Levitical priests, but in the Hebrew manner of thinking, if Jesus was a priest at all, He had to have an altar. And a portion of practically every offering made on the Levitical altar was given to the officiating priest to eat. But where was Jesus’ altar?
After the portions of every fellowship offering were burned on the Levitical altar, the priest and the person who offered the sacrifice would eat the meat together in the temple to show that sin had been dealt with and fellowship with God had been restored.3
But where was the Christian’s altar? Was this not proof of the inferiority of Christianity to Judaism? Christians had no place to go to get forgiven of sin and be reassured of renewed fellowship with God!
Or did they? Consider the altar mentioned repeatedly in the book of Revelation which is before the throne of God in Heaven (Rev. 6:9; 8:3, 5) and which was a center from which the Apostle John witnessed the prayers of God’s people rising to God and from which God spoke and acted (Rev. 9:13; 11:1; 14:18; 16:7).
Within a few years, the tables would be turned. The altar in Jerusalem would be destroyed, never to be rebuilt again, whereas the news of this altar in heaven for Christians was disbursed far and wide with each copy of the New Testament. Christians have an altar unshakeable in heaven where they can get their sins forgiven and be renewed in fellowship with God; the Jews have no altar.
Once again, our apostle drives home the fact that the Jews, who carried on in the ceremonial law and kept on offering animal sacrifices, had missed the boat, since Jesus had claimed the High Priesthood and Kingship as the Anointed One – the Christ.
Jesus is mentioned throughout the New Testament as being invested with rights/authority to give eternal life, to forgive sin, and to judge and rule the world4, and He even conferred that authority to His followers to act as children of God, to preach, to cast out demons, and to rule (Mat. 10:1, John 1:12, 2 Cor. 10:8, Rev. 2:26).
Furthermore we see a “right” mentioned in Revelation 22:14 that includes eating in the presence of God which was only symbolized in the temple fellowship meals: “Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right [authorization] to the tree of life, and may enter through the gates into the city." (NKJV)
Don’t miss the contrasts here:
“We have” vs. “They have”
And a “tent “versus “God”: the Levitical priests “served/ministered in regard to the tabernacle/tent,” but back in Hebrews 12:28 & 9:14, it is declared that Christians “serve/minister to God.” Is your devotion to a tent or to God Himself?
The contrast couldn’t be more stark!
Hebrews 8:1 "Now the sum of what is being said is: we have such a high priest who took office at the right hand of the throne of the Greatest One in the heavens, a minister of the holy things and of the true tabernacle which the Lord constructed and not man... 9:8 "The Holy Spirit is showing that .... the tabernacle... has been a parable in which both donations and sacrifices are being offered that are not able to perfect in conscience the one who ministers - 10 and that are only being imposed until a time of rectification, in regards to foods and drinks and various baptisms and regulations concerning the flesh. 11 But Christ, the high priest of the impending good things, having come along through the greater and more perfect tabernacle - not the hand-made one (that is, not the one of this created-order), 12 entered once-for-all into the holy places, and not by means of the blood of goats or calves but by means of His own blood, after having obtained eternal redemption." (NAW)
"We have an altar, not a material altar, but a personal one, and that is Christ; he is both our altar, and our sacrifice; he sanctifies the gift. The altars under the law were types of Christ; the brazen altar of the sacrifice, the golden altar of his intercession... [T]hat which is eaten... at the gospel altar... is... not... the very sin-offering itself, as the papists affirm; for then it was not to be eaten, but burnt; but the gospel feast is the fruit and procurement of the sacrifice, which those have no right to who do not acknowledge the sacrifice itself." ~Mat. Henry, 1714
“We Christians are permitted spiritually to feast on this sacrifice – to ‘eat the flesh and to drink the blood of the Son of Man.’ We are allowed to feed on the sacrifice offered up for our sins… a far higher privilege in reference to sacred food, not merely than the Israelites, but even than the priests themselves enjoyed… Eating of the sacrifice was a natural emblem of deriving from the sacrifice the advantages it was intended to secure…. The language is figurative… It is, in plain words, our deriving from the sacrifice of Christ the blessings which it is intended and calculated to obtain… the forgiveness of our sins, the sanctification of our natures, and spiritual favorable intercourse with God as our reconciled Father.” ~Dr. John Brown of Edinborough, 1830
Jesus offered Himself as a sin offering, following the pattern of the Old Testament sin offerings in Leviticus 4.
“Outside the camp” parallels “outside the gate.”
The Hebrew settlement at the writing of Leviticus was a camp with a tent-tabernacle in the Sinai desert,
but the settlement of the Jews of Jesus’ day was a city with a tabernacle-temple and gates which defined the boundary of the city.5
Just as the carcass of the bull sacrificed as a sin offering was dragged outside the camp and burned up, so Jesus was moved outside of the city of Jerusalem to be put to death on a cross.
This suffering involved “His own blood” being shed rather than that of another animal – the blood of the Son of God who had truly become Son of Man. As has been pointed out earlier in Hebrews chapters 9 & 10, Jesus’ blood is more efficacious than the blood of mere cattle.
Jesus did this “in order that He might sanctify the people”
For "without the pouring out of blood, forgiveness doesn't happen!" (Heb. 9:22b, NAW)
This hearkens back to the introduction of the Book of Hebrews, verse 3, after the Son of God “made purification from our sins with His own self, He took office [as priest] at the right hand of [God]...” (NAW)
The theme of a sacred/holy God “sanctifying” - making us holy is found throughout the book of Hebrews:
2:10-11 “For it was appropriate to Him, the chief-leader of their salvation... to accomplish success through sufferings, having led many children into glory, because both the One who makes holy and the ones who are being made holy are all of one kind, on account of which He is not ashamed to call them brothers…”
3:1 “In view of which, holy brothers... the High Priest whom we acknowledge is the Messiah Jesus...”
9:13-14 “For, if the blood of bulls and goats and the sprinkling of a heifer's ashes makes those who had been rendered unclean holy to the purification of their flesh, how much more will the blood of the Anointed One (who, through the eternal Spirit offered His faultless self to God) purify y'all's conscience from dead works for devotion to the Living God?”
10:10ff “Because of His desire, we have been made holy through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ singularly. Furthermore, every priest (on the one hand) has officiated [day] after day, ministering and frequently offering the same sacrifices, yet [at] no time are such things able to divest sins, but (on the other hand) this Man, after offering one sacrifice for sins, took office in perpetuity at God's right hand... As a result, by means of one offering, He has perfected in perpetuity those who are being made holy… by the blood of the covenant...”
And who is it that Jesus blood “sanctifies”? When the phrase “the people” occurs in the New Testament, it refers, not to all humans, but rather to a particular set of humans with whom God has a relationship:
In many cases, it is a relationship defined by a covenant with an entire nation (as it was with the people of Israel)6,
other times it is defined as a local body of worshipers in a particular meeting7,
still others, it is a relationship defined spiritually by faith in Jesus8.
Romans 10 & 11 explains the crossover9 of the covenanted nation of Israel to the international church that believes in Jesus: "...First Moses says: 'I will provoke you to jealousy by those who are not a nation, I will move you to anger by a foolish nation.' But Isaiah is very bold and... to Israel he says: "All day long I have stretched out My hands To a disobedient and contrary people." I say then, has God cast away His people? Certainly not! For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not cast away His people whom He foreknew. Or do you not know what the Scripture says... 'I have reserved for Myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.' Even so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace... What then? Israel has not obtained what it seeks; but the elect have obtained it, and the rest were blinded. Just as it is written: 'God has given them a spirit of stupor, Eyes that they should not see...' [B]lindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved..." (Romans 10:19-11:26, NKJV)
P. E. Hughes, one of my father’s seminary professors, made the observation in his commentary on Hebrews that, in going outside the camp, “God draws near to us in the person of his Holy One who, on our unholy ground, makes his holiness available to us in exchange for our sin which he bears and for which he atones on the cross…. ‘This act of sanctification marks the abolition of the necessity of holy places for sanctification.10’” In fact, “ the people’s sin of apostasy had separated them from their God and had defiled the holy ground of the camp, with the result that it was now necessary for anyone who sought the Lord to go forth outside the camp,” as it was in Exodus 33, when Moses pitched the “Tent of Meeting” outside the camp. “Thus the normal situation in which all territory outside the camp was regarded as unholy and the man who left the camp… became unclean was at this time reversed. Sin had rendered the camp unholy, and Moses’ withdrawal in order to establish a holy location outside the camp prefigured the setting up of the Christian altar, Christ’s cross, outside the gate and the necessity for God’s people to join Christ there.”
Jesus did not establish Himself in the city of Jerusalem, either in the palace of Herod or in the temple of Caiaphas. Instead, Jesus died “outside” the city on the hill of Golgotha, and then, when He rose again from the dead, He established Himself at the right hand of God in heaven as the King of Kings and Great High Priest of the heavenly Jerusalem, not the earthly one.
So, the logical conclusion is that, in order to be a citizen of that heavenly city, if we want to enjoy reconciliation with God under Jesus’ high priesthood, if we want to enjoy liberty and justice under Jesus’ reign, we need to exit the earthly Jerusalem and seek Jesus spiritually in the heavenly Jerusalem, no matter how much ridicule there will be from earthly-minded men.
To fortify us in our resolve to make this exit and bear the ridicule for it, God gave us examples to follow:
Chapter 11 highlighted Abraham’s exit from civilization in Ur to follow the Lord: “With faith, Abraham, when he was called, obeyed [and] went out to the place which he was going to receive as an inheritance – indeed, he went out, not knowing where he was going. With faith he migrated into the country of the promise like it was a foreign one, residing in tents... for he was expectantly-waiting for the city that has the foundations, the crafter and builder of which is God! ... having confessed that that they are foreigners and pilgrims upon the earth. Now, those who say such things bring to light that they are eagerly seeking a fatherland. Furthermore, if indeed they had been bringing to mind the one from which they had gone out, they'd be making occasion to double-back. But... a better one is what they long for – that is, a heavenly one; therefore God is not ashamed of them... He even prepared a city for them!” (Hebrews 11:8-16, NAW)
Moses also left the opulent and indulgent lifestyle of a prince in Egypt to be with the Lord (and His people) out in the desert. Hebrews 11:26 said that he was “ridiculed/reproached” for this. And certainly, without the perspective of the shortness and limited-ness of this life compared to the greatness and eternal-ity of the life to come, it would be easy to think of Moses’ wild goose chase to some “promised land” as sheer madness and to make fun of him for it… that is, until you drowned in the Red Sea.
Jesus also left us His example. He taught in His “Sermon On The Mount” that food and drink and clothes “are what the nations are eagerly seeking... But you keep seeking first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added onto you.” (Matt. 6:31-33, NAW) He also said: “Blessed are those who have been persecuted for the sake of righteousness, because the kingdom of heaven is theirs. Y'all are being blessed whenever liars reproach you and persecute [you] and speak every evil against you for my sake. Keep rejoicing and leaping for joy, because your reward is bountiful in heaven...” (Matt. 5:1-12, NAW). Then He walked out of Jerusalem and died to show He meant business, and rose and became our leader-in-chief enthroned in heaven.
Hebrews 10:33-34 also mentions the example of the early church that followed Jesus, enduring sufferings “that [consisted] of being made a public spectacle of, with both insults and oppressions… knowing to have a possession that is better and lasting.” (NAW)
“It [wa]s imperative, therefore,” wrote commentator Phillip Hughes, “that these Hebrew Christians, tempted as they are to insulate themselves from the reproach and the reality of the cross ‘outside the gate’ by retreating to the traditional respectability and apparent solidity of a system which Christ’s coming had rendered obsolete, should learn that here, in this present world order, we have no lasting city.”
Martin Niemoller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer left the mainstream of the German church11 when it replaced Jesus with Hitler as its head; they endured suffering to be with Christ – even imprisonment and death
We too must be willing to go outside the mainstream in order to follow Christ instead of the latest popular leaders, and we need to be willing to suffer in this life in order to be with Christ rather that spend eternity apart from Him.
What are the systems today that we need to leave in order to seek the enduring city of God which is to come?
What systems around us have supplanted Christ with a substitute?
What man-made organizations have repudiated Jesus’ saving power and supreme authority and replaced that with a man-made solution to the world’s problems and a human authority that answers to no one?
I can think of government agencies, educational institutions, denominational churches, non-profit organizations, secret societies, and business partnerships which have done just that, but my job isn’t to list them, but rather to warn you against joining any which deny Christ – and to exhort you to leave any which the Holy Spirit convicts you to abandon.
Leaving (or not joining) may result in you experiencing reproach, insults, fault-finding, derision, disapproval, criticism, scorn. Are you willing to endure that without getting flustered, for the sake of being with Jesus forever?
Let me close with what A. T. Robertson wrote in about this verse in his Word Pictures In The New Testament: “The only decent place for the follower of Christ is beside the Cross of Christ with [its] reproach and [its] power.”12
Greek NT |
NAW |
KJV |
10 ἔχομεν θυσιαστήριον ἐξ οὗ φαγεῖν οὐκ ἔχουσιν ἐξουσίαν οἱ τῇ σκηνῇ λατρεύοντες. |
10 We have an altar from which the men who minister in relation to the tabernacle do not have authority to eat, |
10 We have an altar, whereof they have no right to eat which serve the tabernacle. |
11 ὧν γὰρ εἰσφέρεται ζῴων τὸ αἷμα περὶ ἁμαρτίας εἰς τὰ ἅγια διὰ τοῦ ἀρχιερέως, τούτων τὰ σώματα κατακαίεται ἔξω τῆς παρεμβολῆς. |
11 for the blood of such animals is brought in as a sin-offering into the holy places by the high priest, [and] their bodies are incinerated outside the camp, |
11
For the bodies of those beasts, whose blood is brought into the
sanctuar |
12 διὸ καὶ ᾿Ιησοῦς, ἵνα ἁγιάσῃ διὰ τοῦ ἰδίου αἵματος τὸν λαόν, ἔξω τῆς πύλης ἔπαθε. |
12 so also Jesus, in order that He might sanctify the people through His own blood, suffered outside the gate. |
12 Wherefore Jesus also, that he might sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered without the gate. |
13 τοίνυνB ἐξερχώμεθα πρὸς αὐτὸν ἔξω τῆς παρεμβολῆς τὸν ὀνειδισμὸν αὐτοῦ φέροντες· |
13 So now, let’s keep going out to Him outside the camp, bearing His ridicule, |
13 Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach. |
14 οὐ γὰρ ἔχομεν ὧδε μένουσαν πόλιν. ἀλλὰ τὴν μέλλουσαν ἐπιζητοῦμεν. |
14 for we don’t have a lasting city here, but rather, it’s the impending one that we are eagerly seeking. |
14 For here have we no continuing city, but we seek one to come. |
15 δι᾿ αὐτοῦ οὖν ἀναφέρωμεν θυσίαν αἰνέσεως διὰ παντὸς τῷ Θεῷ, τοῦτ᾿ ἔστι καρπὸν χειλέων ὁμολογούντων τῷ ὀνόματι αὐτοῦ. |
15 Let it be through Him, therefore, that we offer up a thanks-offering always to God, which is fruit of lips confessing His name, |
15 By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name. |
16 τῆς δὲ εὐποιΐας καὶ κοινωνίας μὴ ἐπιλανθάνεσθε· τοιαύταις γὰρ θυσίαις εὐαρεστεῖταιC ὁ Θεός. |
16 and never forget good works and sharing, for with such sacrifices God is well-pleased. |
16 But to do good and to communicate forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased. |
1This information is derived from Charles Colson’s book, Kingdoms in Conflict, chapter 10.
2I
agree with Marvin Vincent's comment here: "It is a mistake to
try to find in the Christian economy some specific object answering
to altar - either the cross, or the eucharistic table, or Christ
himself. Rather the ideas of approach to God, - sacrifice,
atonement, pardon and acceptance, salvation, - are gathered up and
generally represented in the figure of an altar, even as the Jewish
altar was the point at which all these ideas converged. The
application in this broader and more general sense is illustrated by
Ignatius: 'If one be not within the altar (ἐντὸς
τοῦ θυσιαστηρίου
the sacred precinct), he lacketh the bread of God.... Whosoever,
therefore, cometh not to the congregation (ἐπὶ
τὸ αὐτὸ), he
doth thereby show his pride, and hath separated himself...'”
cf.
Phillip E. Hughes’ commentary: “[T]he term ‘altar’
is nowhere in the New Testament associated with the institution
or the observance of the Lord’s Supper, nor is it found as a
synonym for the eucharistic table… The term ‘altar”
as used here is a short of shorthand or synechdoche for the whole
sacrificial action of Christ… It is certainly interesting
to find Thomas Aquinas stating that ‘this altar is either the
cross… or Christ himself… Somewhat similarly, Calvin,
Owen, Westcott, Bonsirven, Spicq, and Montefiore explain this
‘altar’ in terms of the sacrifice of Christ at Calvary,
and Bengel, Lünemann,
Delitzsch, and many others understand it to mean more specifically
the cross on which Christ offered himself.”
31 Cor. 9:13 "Don't you know that the temple workers eat from the things of the temple, and those who attend to the altar share together in the altar sacrifice?" ... 10:18b Aren't the eaters of the sacrifices partners of the altar?" (NAW)
4Mat. 7:29, 9:6, 28:18, John 5:27, 17:2, Col. 2:10, Eph. 1:20-22, 1 Peter 3:22, Jude 1:25, Rev. 12:10
5“What
originally was not lawful to be done in the camp, it was afterwards
unlawful to do in the city.” ~ Maimonides, 12th
Century Jewish scholar, quoted by Dr. John Brown’s commentary
.
"[T]he system which has its center in Jerusalem, the
Holy City, is no more ours. We are excluded from its religious
fellowship by embracing the faith of him who suffered without the
gate. The city itself is not abiding. As a holy city, it is the
center and representative of a system of shadows and figures, which
is to be shaken and removed, even as is the city itself..."
~Marvin Vincent
6Matthew
2:6
“... out of you [Bethlehem] will come One who leads, who will
shepherd the
people
of Mine, Israel."
Heb.
9:19 "for,
after every commandment in the law had been uttered by Moses to all
the
people,
[and] after taking the blood of the calves and goats with water and
scarlet yarn and a hyssop-branch, he sprinkled both the book itself
and all the
people...
7:5
...the sons of Levi have, according to the law, a command to collect
tithes from the
people" (NAW)
7Acts 13:14 "... [Paul and Barnabas] went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day and sat down. 15 And after the reading of the Law and the Prophets, the rulers of the synagogue sent to them, saying, 'Men and brethren, if you have any word of exhortation for the people, say on.'" (NKJV, cf. Acts 3:12, 21:39)
8Mat.
1:21
"...you will call Him by the name Jesus, because He Himself
will save the
people
of His from their sins..."
Hebrews
10:29 "how much worse punishment do y'all suppose will be
deserved by the one who has trampled down the Son of God and who has
decided that the blood of the covenant (by which he was made holy)
is profane, and who has insulted the Spirit of Grace?" 30
For we know the One who said, "Vengeance belongs to me; I
myself will render payback," {says the Lord,} and again, "The
Lord will judge the people of His." (NAW)
9cf. the crossover in Luke 3:18&21 "...he [John] preached to the people... and all the people were baptized" (NKJV)
10Quoting Helmut Koester’s article on this passage in the 1962 Harvard Theological Review
11John Brown noted in his commentary that William Wilson of Perth also used this passage of scripture in the founding of the Scottish Secession movement from the corrupt Anglican church. He also noted that Chrysostom used this passage dubiously as proof for Christians to be buried outside of cities.
12John Gill emphasized "going out" in a spiritual sense in his commentary, which is a fair application, but not, in my opinion, the one intended: "[A] man may be said to ‘go forth’ from hence, when he professes not to belong to the world; when his affections are weaned from it; when the allurements of it do not draw him aside; when he forsakes, and suffers the loss of all, for Christ; when he withdraws from the conversation of the men of it, and breathes after another world; and to go forth from hence, ‘unto him’, unto Christ, shows, that Christ is not to be found in the camp, in the world..."
AThe
Greek is the Majority text, edited by myself to follow the majority
of the earliest-known manuscripts only when the early manuscript
evidence is practically unanimous. My original document includes
notes on the NKJV, NASB, NIV, & ESV English translations, but
since they are all copyrighted, I cannot include them in my online
document. Underlined words in English versions indicate a
standalone difference from all other English translations of a
certain word. Strikeout usually indicates that the
English translation is, in my opinion, too far outside the range of
meaning of the original Greek word. The addition of an X indicates a
Greek word left untranslated – or a plural Greek word
translated as an English singular. [Brackets] indicate words added
in English not in the Greek. {Pointed Braces} indicate words added
in Greek to the original. Key words are colored consistently across
the chart to show correlations.
BThis is one of several conjunctions used by our writer to indicate a conclusion to an argument, including: οὖν (used in v.15 - and in 12 other places) being the most common, διο from Heb. 13:12 (occurring 8 other places), and αρα (Heb. 12:8 & 4:9). This conjunction, like τοιγαροῦν from Heb 12:1, only occurs once in Hebrews (but is in 10 other places in the Greek Bible: 1 Chr. 28:10; 2 Chr. 28:23; Job 8:13; 36:14; Isa. 3:10; 5:13; 27:4; 33:23; Lk. 20:25; and 1 Cor. 9:26, whereas toigaroun only has 6 other occurrences).
CThe only other occurrences of this verb in the N.T. are in Heb. 11:5 & 6.